hjeat: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 51: Line 51:
* When negating propositions, accusative direct objects change to the genitive.
* When negating propositions, accusative direct objects change to the genitive.
* The connegative of {{m|rad|vat}}, ''*vata'', does not exist: '''hjeat''' on its own means ''to not be'', unless accompanying a connegative form of another verb, in which case it acts as negation of that verb.
* The connegative of {{m|rad|vat}}, ''*vata'', does not exist: '''hjeat''' on its own means ''to not be'', unless accompanying a connegative form of another verb, in which case it acts as negation of that verb.
** Note also that {{m|rad|hjeat}} has no compound forms. For negative compound forms, see {{m|rad|vat}}.
* As an auxiliary, ''hjeat'' must still bear all matrix inflection.
* As an auxiliary, ''hjeat'' must still bear all matrix inflection.
** The exception to this is voice, where non-finite forms have separate passive forms. Therefore, when negating a passive verb, the passive is marked in the connegative, as ''hjeat'' does not have passive forms.
** The exception to this is voice, where non-finite forms have separate passive forms. Therefore, when negating a passive verb, the passive is marked in the connegative, as ''hjeat'' does not have passive forms.

Navigation menu