11,884
edits
TheNightAvl (talk | contribs) m (→Phonology) |
TheNightAvl (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
** <ⲁ> could represent /ɑ(ː)/ or /æ(ː)/ (the latter distinguished as <ⲁ̣́> in modern marking) | ** <ⲁ> could represent /ɑ(ː)/ or /æ(ː)/ (the latter distinguished as <ⲁ̣́> in modern marking) | ||
** <ⲉ> could represent /e(ː)/ or /ɤ(ː)/ (the latter distinguished as <ⲉ̀> in modern marking) | ** <ⲉ> could represent /e(ː)/ or /ɤ(ː)/ (the latter distinguished as <ⲉ̀> in modern marking) | ||
** <ⲓ> could represent /i(ː)/ or /ɯ(ː)/ | ** <ⲓ> could represent /i(ː) j/ or /ɯ(ː)/ (the latter distinguished as <ⲓ̀> in modern marking) | ||
** <ⲟ> could represent /o(ː)/ or /ø(ː)/ (the latter distinguished as <ⲟ́> in modern marking) | ** <ⲟ> could represent /o(ː)/ or /ø(ː)/ (the latter distinguished as <ⲟ́> in modern marking) | ||
** <ⲩ> could represent /u(ː)/ or /y(ː)/ | ** <ⲩ> could represent /u(ː) w/ or /y(ː)/ (the latter distinguished as <ⲩ́> in modern marking) | ||
** It is thus uncertain whether Old Ardian had retained vowel length, but the distinction's only legacy in the modern language is the mobile stress system, as in {{w|Lusetian_language|Lusetian}}. No written form of Ardian has ever alluded to length being distinctive, so it is thought to have at least been lost early on. | ** It is thus uncertain whether Old Ardian had retained vowel length, but the distinction's only legacy in the modern language is the mobile stress system, as in {{w|Lusetian_language|Lusetian}}. No written form of Ardian has ever alluded to length being distinctive, so it is thought to have at least been lost early on. | ||
*** Many argue that the mobile stress system developed alongside Lusetian's, thus making vowel length still distinctive in Old Ardian as it was in Old Lusetian. | *** Many argue that the mobile stress system developed alongside Lusetian's, thus making vowel length still distinctive in Old Ardian as it was in Old Lusetian. | ||
** Apart from the case of /ɑ æ/, which is reconstructed primarily based on ancient loanwords and parallels in Old Radestrian, the front-back pairs are internally reconstructed based on the various reflexes in Modern Ardian: | ** Apart from the case of /ɑ æ/, which is reconstructed primarily based on ancient loanwords and parallels in Old Radestrian, the front-back pairs are internally reconstructed based on the various reflexes in Modern Ardian: | ||
*** <ⲉ> /e/ yields modern /e/, whereas <ⲉ> /ɤ/ yields modern /ə/, for example. | *** <ⲉ> /e/ yields modern /e/, whereas <ⲉ> /ɤ/ yields modern /ə/, for example. |